Supreme Court
More stories
-
Should Justices Alito and Thomas Be Impeached Justia’s Verdict
Is Impeachment the Answer for Supreme Court Justices Alito and Thomas? The Issue at Hand Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas have become the subject of criticism from the public and legal practitioners on account of their partisan behavior and lack of ethics. The Justices’ actions have, in turn, reduced the public’s confidence in the […] More
-
Smith v. Spizzirri The Supreme Court Confirms That Stay Means Stay When Arbitration Is…
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Clarified Position on Compelling Arbitration with Smith v. Spizzirri Decision On May 16, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court released a unanimous decision in Smith v. Spizzirri. The ruling resolved a circuit split that previously affected the interpretation and application of Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Background of the […] More
-
Smith v. Spizzirri The Supreme Court confirms that Stay means Stay when Arbitration is
Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Decision in Smith v. Spizzirri on Section 3 of the FAA Introduction On May 16, 2024, the U. S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Smith v. Spizzirri that resolved a significant Circuit split in the interpretation and application of Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) related to […] More
-
Supreme Court Upholds the Meaning of “Stay” in Smith v. Spizzirri Arbitration Case
Implications of Smith v. Spizzirri Decision on US Arbitration Law Implications of Smith v. Spizzirri Decision on US Arbitration Law Background of the Case In May 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Smith v. Spizzirri, settling a circuit split that had affected the interpretation and implementation of Section 3 of […] More
-
Smith v Spizzirri The Supreme Court Confirms That Stay Means Stay When Arbitration Is…
Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split on Compelling Arbitration On May 16, 2024, the United States Supreme Court provided much-needed clarity on the interpretation and application of Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in its decision regarding Smith v. Spizzirri. This editorial will explore the case in detail, its implications for arbitration practice and […] More
-
Nation at stake after Supreme Court overturns Chevron – The Daily Wildcat
The Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Doctrine: How It Affects Environmental, Healthcare, and Labor Regulations Background The Supreme Court has overturned the landmark 1984 decision in Chevron U. S. A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., also known as the Chevron doctrine. The Chevron doctrine allowed administrative agencies to make reasonable interpretations of ambiguous federal […] More
-
Nation at Stake After Supreme Court Overturns Chevron – The Daily Wildcat
The Supreme Court Overturns 1984 Chevron Doctrine The Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1984 decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., on Friday, June 28. The Chevron doctrine allowed for legislative delegation to administrative agencies to make reasonable interpretations of ambiguous federal laws in which the court is unable to substitute […] More
-
Missouri High Court Frees Woman from 43-Year Imprisonment
The Missouri Supreme Court Clears the Way for a Woman’s Release After 43 Years in Prison The Overturned Conviction The Missouri Supreme Court has recently issued a landmark decision by overturning the conviction of a woman who has been in prison for 43 years for a crime that she did not commit. The court’s decision […] More