The Alberta Court of Appeal Upholds Driver’s Claim for Psychological Injury Following Motor Vehicle Accident
The Case of Plante v Administrator of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act
The recent ruling by the Alberta Court of Appeal in the case of Plante v Administrator of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act, 2024 ABCA 156, has upheld a driver’s claim for psychological injury following a fatal motor vehicle accident. The case is significant because it involved an unusual set of circumstances and raised questions about the application of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act.
The Facts of the Case
Verna Baptiste’s vehicle ran out of gas on a rural highway at night. Under the influence of alcohol, she exited her vehicle and entered the roadway to seek help, where she was fatally struck by another vehicle. The respondent, who was driving the vehicle that hit Baptiste, subsequently sued her estate for compensation due to the psychological injuries he suffered, including post-traumatic stress disorder. Baptiste did not have motor vehicle liability insurance, and her estate was noted in default.
Questions Raised by the Case
The case raised questions about the application of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act. Under the act, individuals who recover a judgment for bodily injury from motor vehicle use can apply for payment from the administrator. The respondent notified the administrator, who then defended the action. At a summary trial, the judge concluded that the respondent’s claim was covered under the act because his injuries arose from Baptiste’s use or operation of her vehicle. The administrator appealed this decision, arguing that the judge erred in fact and law, particularly in finding an unbroken chain of causation linking Baptiste’s actions to the respondent’s injuries and relying on outdated case law.
The Court’s Findings
The court noted that sections 4(1) and 5(1) of the act were central to the case, specifying that damages for bodily injury must arise out of the use or operation of a motor vehicle. The two-part test for coverage includes determining whether the vehicle was used for an ordinary activity and if there was an unbroken chain of causation linking the injuries to the vehicle’s use. The administrator contended that the trial judge misapplied the law and argued that the connection between Baptiste’s use of her vehicle and the respondent’s injuries was too remote. However, the Court of Appeal disagreed, affirming that the chain of causation was clear. Baptiste’s use of her vehicle to transport herself to the location and her subsequent actions were within the expected use of a highway, evidenced by the respondent’s reduced speed and awareness of the parked vehicle with hazard lights. Ultimately, the court dismissed the appeal, maintaining the ruling that the respondent’s claim fell within the scope of the act due to the unbroken chain of causation linking Baptiste’s vehicle use to the injuries suffered.
The Significance of the Case
The Plante v Administrator of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act case is significant because it demonstrates the importance of understanding the specific requirements of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act when making a claim for compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. It is important to consider the circumstances of the accident and determine whether there is an unbroken chain of causation linking the injuries to the vehicle’s use.
About the Canadian Legal Newswire
The Canadian Legal Newswire is a FREE newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the Canadian legal scene. A separate InHouse Edition is delivered on a regular basis, providing targeted news and information of interest to in-house counsel.
Topical Keywords for Search Engine Optimization:
Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act
The Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act is a law in Alberta that allows individuals who suffer bodily injuries from motor vehicle use to apply for payment from the administrator.
Causation in Personal Injury Cases
Causation is a critical element in personal injury cases. To establish liability, it must be shown that there is an unbroken chain of causation linking the injuries sustained to the defendant’s actions.
Psychological Injuries in Motor Vehicle Accidents
Psychological injuries, including post-traumatic stress disorder, can result from motor vehicle accidents and can be compensable under the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act.
Insurance Requirements for Motor Vehicle Owners
Motor vehicle owners are required to have liability insurance in Alberta to cover damages and injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident.
Alcohol-Related Accidents and Liability
Drinking and driving is a serious offence in Alberta and can have significant legal and financial consequences for those who are found liable for accidents stemming from alcohol use.
Originally Post From https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/practice-areas/personal-injury/court-upholds-drivers-psychological-injury-claim-against-estate-of-pedestrian-he-struck-killed/386607
Read more about this topic at
What Is Legal Liability in Business Insurance?
What is legal liability?